Franz Kline and Myself
Recording "Fra Vestfjorden"
Hoizon-no horizon poetry
Design and branding
My designer, Jennifer Wiseman, got a hello good morning moment today discovering her branding for myself featured in Branding served. Branding Served features top work in categories such as identity, branding, and logo design.
She has done several projects for me including two posters, flyers, booklet and a business card. The amazing print shop in Nijmegen, Holland, Extrapool did the print job. Congrats, Jen!
Maya Deren - Meshes of the Afternoon (1943)
A former student of mine recently made me think of this old classic.
I saw it for the first time 7-8 years ago, but it's still something incessantly uncomfortable about it.
++
++ is a new art concept in the foyer of Black Box Teater in Oslo, Norway. A hundred square meter entrance hall, six meters to the ceiling and an loaded bar will during three nights this spring show art of different disciplines -visual arts, litterature, video art, fanzines, concerts and performing arts. It is going to be visual, auditive, tactile and definitely stimulating.
++ means nothing less than Black Box Teater plus plus, -an extention of the field of performing arts that the house already consists of. From a wide artistic field, ++ will invite both unestablished and established artists, aiming to be a meeting point where audience and artists can be inspired by each other.
++ is curated by Hedda Abildsnes (Black Box Teater), Signe Becker (scenographer) and Cecilie Bjørgås Jordheim (visual artist).
February 28th, April 5th. and May 31st.
Free entrance.
Welcome!
High ideals and pleasing the masses
Oskar Fischinger's statement about Absolute Film published 1947, though purist and creative-romantic, still hits me everytime I read it.
My Statements are in My Work
by Oskar Fischinger
To write about my work in the absolute film is rather difficult. The only thing to do is to write why I made these films.
When I was 19 years old I had to talk about a certain work by William Shakespeare in our Literary club. In preparing for this speech I began to analyze the work in a graphic way. One large sheets of drawing paper, along a horizontal line, I put down all the feelings and happenings, scene after scene, in graphic lines and curves. The lines and curves showed the dramatic development of the whole work and the emotional moods very clearly.
It was quite an interesting beginning, but not many could understand this graphic, absolute expression.
To make it more convincing, more easily understood, the drawings needed movement, the same speed and tempo as the feeling originally possessed. The cinematic element had to be added.
To do this, the motion picture film was a welcome medium. And so it happened that I made my first absolute film.
Then sound was added to the film. On the wings of music faster progress was possible.
The flood of feeling created through music intensified the feeling and effectiveness of this graphic cinematic expression, and helped to make understandable the absolute film. Under the guidance of music, which was already highly developed there came the speedy discovery of new laws - the application of acoustical laws to optical expression was possible. As in the dance, new motions and rhythms sprang out of the music - and the rhythms became more and more important.
I named these absolute films Studies; and I numbered them - Study No. 1, Study No. 2, and so forth. These early black and white studies drew enthusiastic response at the time from the most famous art critics of England and Europe.
Then came the color film. Of course, the temptation was great to work in color, and I made thereafter a number of absolute color films. But I soon found out that the simplicity of my own black and white films could never be surpassed.
The color film proved itself to be an entirely new art form with its own artistic problems as far removed from black and white film as music itself - as an art medium - is removed from painting. Searching, for the last thirteen years, to find the ideal solution to this problem, I truly believe I have found it now, and my new, forthcoming work will show it.
Now a few words about the usual motion picture film which is shown to the masses everywhere in countless moving picture theatres all over the world. It is photographed realism - photographed surface realism-in-motion ... There is nothing of an absolute artistic creative sense in it. It copies only nature with realistic conceptions, destroying the deep and absolute creative force with substitutes and surface realisms. Even the cartoon film is today on a very low artistic level. It is a mass product of factory proportions, and this, of course, cuts down the creative purity of a work of art. No sensible creative artist could create a sensible work of art if a staff of co-workers of all kinds had his or her say in the final creation - producer, story director, story writer, music director, conductor, composers, sound men, gag men, effect men, layout men, background directors, animators, inbetweeners, inkers, cameramen, technicians, publicity directors, managers, box office managers, and many others. They change the ideas, kill the ideas, before they are born, prevent the ideas from being born, and substitute for the absolute creative motives only the cheap ideas to fit the lowest among them.
The creative artist of the highest level always works at his best alone, moving far ahead of his time. And this shall be our basis: That the Creative Spirit shall be unobstructed through realities or anything that spoils his absolute pure creation.
And so we cut out the tremendous mountains of valueless motion picture productions of the past and the future - the mountain ranges of soap bubbles, and we must concentrate on the tiny golden thread underneath which is hardly visible beneath the glamorous, sensational excitement, securely buried for a long time, especially in our own time when the big producing and distributing monopolies control every motion picture screen in an airtight grip.
Consequently, there is only one way for the creative artist: To produce only for the highest ideals - not thinking in terms of money or sensations or to please the masses.
The real artist should not care if he is understood, or misunderstood by the masses. He should listen only to his Creative Spirit and satisfy his highest ideals, and trust that this will be the best service that he can render humanity.
It is the only hope for the creative artist that the art lovers, the art collectors, the art institutes, and the art museums develop increasingly greater interest in this direction, and make it possible for the artist to produce works of art through the medium of the film.
In this connection I wish to express my deep gratitude to one great American institution which has in the past helped so many artists in an idealistic, unselfish way, and which has made it possible for me to do a great amount of research work in the direction of the absolute, non-objective film. I am speaking of the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation in New York under the direction of Curator Hilla Rebay.
First printed in Art in Cinema catalog, San Francisco Museum of Art, 1947
copyright Elfriede Fischinger Trust, all rights reserved
"Natural Science Approach to Synesthesia. (Picking my brain)"
Shown at Oslo Art Academy's Christmas Calendar Dec.22. 2010, the project is based upon human's explicit need to put the world into a system and the challenges, and the possible lack of equipment or knowledge, natural science meet in order to describe all human phenomena.
The photos are MR-scans of the artist's brain done for an experiment by students in cognitive neurology at the University of Oslo.
Can not help myself quoting from Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus by Ludwig Wittgenstein
«4.113 Philosophy sets limits to the much disputed sphere of natural science»
Synesthesia is explained as a condition which has an impact on the senses; e.g. you experience music, letters or numbers as shapes and colours or vice versa.
Take a look at the whole exhibition here.
Instructions for hair
Daily Studio Practise
"Practease (Jean-Paul)"
"Practease (Never trust a pioneer)"
"Practease (Arp)"
"Practease (Envelope)"
Other collage projects: (Pro)found
Practease (Hommage to Ellsworth Kelly)
Genius
The talk reflects on the difference of being a genius and having a genius. My favourite part is where Tom Waits addresses the genius while driving.
The language of the eye
Harry Smith
De topografie van geluid en stroopwafels op de versterker
(as meditative as it might sound).
The piece presented was Kjell Samkopf and Floris Van Manen's "Marimba & Town Hall" from the series of work called "Listening Ahead". With a strict listening regime with a set of rules; sitting on a chair with headphones in a dimmed room not allowed to talk before 5 minutes after the piece was done, I found myself sitting for 90 minutes listening to the marimba in acoustic dialogue with the architectural structure of Oslo Town Hall. I thought I was bored after a couple of minutes but after checking the time it had been 40 minutes already.
Unlike my projects at the moment, there's little conceptual basis in Samkopf and Van Manen's impressionistic duet of environment vs. instrument, though there was something quite interesting about it in a formalistic way. The composition seemed to expand not only in linearity but mostly in a 3D auditive topography where several layers of sound gives you the option of jumping in the narrative. By selecting an audio layer to follow, the narrative transports you a few blocks away. Not unlike a video game.
The goal of this project was, in the words of the artists, the listening part. To me the statements "joy of listening" and "listening for the listening's sake" is just another uninspired phrase.
Agree with me or not.
But I did like the thought of sound deriving from acoustics in actual architecture emerging back into an inner and associative topography.
Mysticism, power, science and art.
to combine factual knowledge in
e.g. mathematics with an intuitive
sensibility of the basic connections
like Pythagoras did (..)"
The rise of Italian humanism in the Renaissance provided a more scientific base on how we see the world. It was not until the discovery of the central perspective and Leonardo Da Vinci that the art of painting got a higher rank and was looked upon as a mathematic construct. Music on the other hand had been considered celestial and looked upon as the superior art form since antiquity.
Jeremy Welsh on the project POLARSTAR
Let’s say it has to do with navigation; there is a space to be traversed, a route to be followed, and there are instructions to be followed. Things happen. The world is bigger than the map. We use abstractions to communicate our understanding of the physical world, but nature has ways of her own and try as we might we can never reduce the complexity of the world to a reliable set of descriptions. A boat on the vast ocean is, more than anything, an act of defiance and a statement of faith in our ability to interpret and translate nature’s chaotic behaviour. Somehow, miraculously, this tiny vessel manages to negotiate the treacherous terrain of an aquatic body in constant motion. It returns to harbour, the place where humanity’s domain gives way to that of the tides and currents, the mythic realm of Poseidon. Poseidon and Polaris - leading characters in this narrative that will be translated into a cinematics of the unstable.
Audiovisuality, a concatenation of the realms of two senses, is, in Polar Star, a negotiation or an act of translation between distinct and separate, but nevertheless related forms. A series of abstractions that are, to the navigator, a means of interpreting the physical world, become “real-ised”, given physical form as optical data that is converted into sound waves. Each of these conversions becomes an auditory narrative that unfolds and develops over time - but the plot line of the narrative escapes us. We may listen closely and observe the internal logic of the development of this sonic journey while becoming aware of the correspondence between what is seen and what is heard. These are phenomena that can be observed. We can talk about machineries of vision, the arts of reproduction, but will this help us? A film editing bench, some light boxes, cables, loudspeakers - the apparatus whereby we experience this displacement of (de) contextualised information - function both as mise-en-scene and as the central characters of the drama. A drama which is, and is not, the retelling of a story; which is, and is not a meditation on the mechanics of reproduction that have come to shape our understanding of the world.
Cinema was said to be the defining art of the 20th. Century, the most industrial of arts for the most industrial of centuries. Contemporary Art’s almost pathological obsession with the archeological remains of cinema’s pre- or early history suggests either a yearning for a materiality that disappeared with the advent of digital media, or else a quest to unearth lost narratives belonging to cinematic experiments that were eclipsed by the rise of industrial film. From the early sound and image compositions of Walter Ruttman, through the collage films of Stan Brakhage, the visionary narratives of Maya Deren, the expanded cinema of Warhol’s Exploding Plastic Inevitable to the film installations of Tacita Dean, there is a rich seam of other stories and under-explored potentials running through the history of the art of cinema. Some of these forgotten narratives have been rediscovered, adopted, incorporated into the mainstream language of audiovisuality, but more often than not, their particularity is lost in translation. Content becomes stylistic device, becomes sign for a certain cultural attitude, becomes cliché, becomes discarded. Contemporary image culture is a voracious devourer of all styles, all formal innovations and all histories of the visual.
Postmodernism was the age of deconstruction, a period in which everything was taken apart and some things were put back together in new combinations. We talked of the “recombinant” a kind of genetic re-coding of cultural artefacts. One of the characteristics of art in the present era seems to be a sort of trans-historical simultaneity of forms, narratives and situations that fundamentally challenges our conventional, linear reading of history. Time’s arrow does not seem to fly in a straight line or a in single direction. Old and new technologies are merged to devise hybrids that transcend the intended use-boundaries of their constituent parts. Old and new media shed their oldness or their newness and become instead choices in a palette of possibilities to be explored by the artist whose researches produce an understanding of how this or that, connected to that or this, may equip us with new or better tools for aesthetic understanding. This is indeed a form of sensuous knowledge. It may defy logic and will certainly require leaps of faith. It is knowledge that will be whispered in our ear using words we have not yet learned to understand, or that will be revealed to us in the form of images whose significance we will have to decode. We will have to translate this information into terms that we can use but we must translate with great care, subtlety and delicacy so that the fragile kernel of enhanced understanding can still be found, rather than lost in translation.
Jeremy Welsh
Septenber 2009